0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
That same sort of "crap" was tried here in Oregon a couple of years ago with a signature pattition called "Measure 64". It would have not allowed me to harvest any tree on my place that was over 24"dbh. That would have included 80% of the growing fiber I have. That included: Douglas Fir, Grand Fir, Gary Oak, and Western Big Leaf Maple. As far AS I am concerned that is a taking of personal property, but the "Tree Huggers" felt great about it. The measure was defeated 2 to 1. I was sure happy about that, because I did not want them to have to bring a lunch to try and stop me from harvesting any of "my" timber. They probably would have left wrappers as the trees would have been falling in their direction.