Get your Forestry Forum Hats while they last!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I had the LT28 for a month then upgraded to the LT35 before my 30day money back deal ended with woodmizer. It was a good meal and is very similar to my LT35. However if you are going to do portable jobs they Hdy are a must! I did two mobile jobs with the 28 I had and the log loading (using the winch) really slows you down when you are trying to get logs sawed. It is a great mill, and you can't beat it for the price, but rethink the Hyd cause the LT35 is a good value for the money.
I had the LT28 for a month then upgraded to the LT35 before my 30day money back deal ended with woodmizer. It was a good meal and is very similar to my LT35. However if you are going to do portable jobs they Hdy are a must!
I have to agree with this. I have an LT15 and see zero advantage to a 28 unless you always have help. The bigger log advantage is negated by not having hydraulics to turn them. I saw alone 90% of the time and have to call friends & neighbors over for the big stuff. Some day I will up-grade and it will be to a LT35 which I think is at the right price point.
This is an interesting post. It is a long standing argument in the service/professional service segment of the economy. I believe portable saw customers and most milling customers are paying for an end product. Within reason, speed would not be my concern, quality would be. If the client wants speed I would suggest another sawyer with a higher production mill. I hope that sawyer would charge as much and maybe a bit more that I would for the same work.
Testing New Bottom Sponsor Area