Author Topic: Tree Tags (Read 2502 times)

OneWithWood · « **on:** December 02, 2003, 08:06:29 am »

I have been thinking about ordering some tree tags so I can inventory my stand. I hope to transfer the data to some Topo software. The only nails offered by the company that carries the tags are 2 1/4" aluminum nails.
Can these nails be used without damaging the tree? Is there a better way to fasten the tags? I hate piercing the bark if it is going to invite problems.

Jeff · « **Reply #1 on:** December 02, 2003, 04:00:31 pm »

And I hate to hit nails, even aluminum nails damage saw teeth. I would think something shorter should do the job unless you feel you have interlopers that might try to pull tags. I'll try to remember to bring a couple of my sign nail pulling teeth from work to show. The aluminium 1 inch nails must work fine cause I keep finding them still in the trees.

Stephen_Wiley · « **Reply #2 on:** December 02, 2003, 05:37:39 pm »

One w/wood,

What species of tree are you tagging? (i.e. thin bark or deep fissured).

Have you considered # 'd survey stakes driven on the Northside of tree. No damage occurs to trees and vandals will not be aware of their presence.

Bud Man · « **Reply #3 on:** December 02, 2003, 07:53:17 pm »

Think I'd use rebar in combination with GPS and plant several of each species to ensure success of the species. That with a topo map identifing the GPS locations and with the use of a detector ought to last your lifetime ! The next generation can replace the rebar as needed and charge the general public to view your perpetual garden efforts. The trees will also enjoy the Iron ! Create a map of the species and let folks try and identify each of the plots with you supplying the right answers for whatever level of gratification you desire. Let your imagination run and have fun and enjoy !

Ron Wenrich · « **Reply #4 on:** December 03, 2003, 02:30:12 pm »

Just curious, but why are you tagging your trees just for an inventory? I've never done that.

If you are looking for permanent plots, you could just go the GIS route and make a simple map for each plot, if you are looking to plot growth.

Jeff · « **Reply #5 on:** December 03, 2003, 02:45:12 pm »

This is how I find those 1 inch aluminium sign nails. At least they only bung up one tooth. Usually.

woodmills1 · « **Reply #6 on:** December 03, 2003, 06:46:39 pm »

OUCH!

did something yesterday that was a first for me. Brushed the feed speed with my sleeve and drove the blade into the log way too fast. Won't be using that one again.

OneWithWood · « **Reply #7 on:** December 04, 2003, 08:01:57 am »

Ron,
Maybe I am being overly anal. I would like to have a listing of my harvestable and near harvestable trees complete with species, location, grade and estimated board feet for each tree. It is just a part of my overall plan and may allow me to make better decisions on whether to buy logs or harvest my own for particular orders. Doing the actual inventory is a great way for me to stay very connected to my trees and property.
Stephen,
I would be tagging Oaks ( red, black, white, chinkapin, chestnut ) Poplars, Walnut, Hickories ( Mockernut, Pignut, Shagbark ) Maple, Sassafrass, Basswood, Ash, Sycamore, Cherry, Beech, Gum etc.
Bud Man,
That would be a lot of rebar to tote around! I thought of using aluminum plant tags that stick in the ground but they are expensive and I would have to engrave, emboss or otherwise stamp each one. I also like the fact that if the trees are tagged interlopers might understand that I care about my trees and show them a bit more respect. ( I could be kidding myself on the last one)

Ron Wenrich · « **Reply #8 on:** December 04, 2003, 02:15:35 pm »

Are you planning a 100% sample? It sounds like a lot of work, and some of it is probably unnecessary.

How many acres are you talking about? If its only a few acres, then it wouldn't be so bad. Personally, I would find all those tags distracting from the character of the forest.

Instead of using nails, maybe you can get away with a staple gun. Staples probably wouldn't get down into the wood area, and stay in the bark.

Stephen_Wiley · « **Reply #9 on:** December 04, 2003, 03:12:09 pm »

My initial thought is what 'Ron' just referred to in stapling them on.

However, my past experience is that stapling is temporary and will require you to walk through and reapply them from time to time.

I have also used thin wiring wrapped around the circumference or "j" hooked into the bark. This has been more effective than staples as forest critters often can unloose the tag.

How many acres are you doing this on ?

I might suggest that a 'actual' site map with tree location be created using GIS or just visually blocking off 100' square areas using a tape and mapping trees within this block area. Then the need to tag could be greatly reduced to block corners only, or not at all. (Since the map is reflective of actual trees)

The map will provide the management tool you seek. To address onlookers purchase some "Stand Exam" flagging tape and leave 'streamers' in trees (with staples) or wrap from tree to tree where onlookers will most likely interact with your woods.

OneWithWood · « **Reply #10 on:** December 05, 2003, 06:42:12 am »

I have 100 acres of which 95 is forested.
I agree it is a lot of work - but pleasurable work for me.
Stephen makes a good point about the asthetics of all the tagged trees. Maybe I will go back to GPS coordinates and not leave a tag. Or maybe I could place the tags at the base of the tree close to the ground where the average person never looks.
I have placed 2" PVC pipes over steel fence post all around the property boundary so at least one other pipe is visable from each one. To each pipe I have attached a 3" tree farm system sign as well as a classified habitat or classified forestry sign. Many of the posts also have a No Tresspassing / No Hunting sign attached.
Actually, I think I could incorporate the earlier suggestion about the rebar and mount the tags on a spike and stick them in the ground at the base of the tree on the north side. Gee, if I do that then when I get disoriented I could always look for the tag

I know the professional foresters take site estimates and draw all sorts of useful info such as basal stem area (or something like that) and can also estimate quite accurately the volume by species of an area. Can you also get an accurate estimate of volume by grade? In a mixed hardwood forest how many plots would you estimate? Would each plot be 100 square feet? The terrain is ridges and ravines. Would you select plots based on geographic orientation?
Thank you all for taking the time to answer my questions. I hope you have not hurt yourselves laughing to hard over the thought of a 100% tree inventory

Remember I am a bean counter in one of my lives and thrive on detail

However, I can see the forest for the trees

Ron Wenrich · « **Reply #11 on:** December 05, 2003, 11:01:28 am »

100% inventories are fine when you go and mark trees for removal. But, even that can be cumbersome.

There are several different ways to take an inventory. Personally, I like variable plots and use a 10% sample. It can give as much data as you need, as long as you collect it at the time of the inventory. I have found that my inventory is correct within about 3-5%.

I have written some infor over in the Knowledge Base on point sampling. This will give you an idea of how to start, how to cruise, and how to compute the findings.

Every time you take a sample, each tree is a representative of several trees per acre, depending on size. The more plots, the more the accuracy.

I take a plot every 200 feet (for 10% cruise) or every 300 feet (for 5% cruise). I conduct these on a north-south, east-west grid. As I go along, I will draw a pretty decent map. I will also note each plot # for location on the map.

After you are done, you may find that you have several different types of forests within your property. These may be due to size of trees, slope, aspect, tocking, species composition, etc. You will be able to identify those areas on your map. It will be real cool how everything falls into place.

From your new map, you will be able to determine the area for forest type. Then, you will compute the volume per acre for the combined plots in that type. That will give you a pretty good idea of volumes, stocking levels, etc. Then you can make some pretty intelligent decisions on what to do next.

I usually give the trees a 1,2,3 type of grading system. You can do this on quality or by vigor. I also mark which trees I think should come out. That will give me a definite volume if there are any harvest recommendations. When compiled, it will show how much good stocking I have. If there isn't enough, what do you do then?

The total cost for equipment is pretty low. You need a compass, a notebook, a pencil, a diameter tape (if taking diameters), some surveying ribbon, and an angle guage. I prefer an angle guage over a prism due to their durability, their price and their versatility. You should also have a dot grid to determine area. I think you can get away with less than a $100 investment.

Sound forest management begins with a timber inventory. Too much timber gets cut without the benefit of an initial cruise, in my opinion.

Bro. Noble · « **Reply #12 on:** December 05, 2003, 11:03:25 am »

OWW,

My Dad has done our tree marking for thinning and harvesting. While he is marking, he makes notes of exceptionally large trees (which we often leave) , trees needing harvesting but of a species that we aren't cutting currently, or trees of veneer grade. He made a map using graph paper and an aerial photo and then made several photocopies. He can go right to any tree he made notes on by using co-ordinates. Dad also has several plots throughout the property where he takes yearly measurements of trees. To identify these, he smoothes the outer bark with a hand axe and they paints numbers on them. In addition to this, we had the farm forester make an inventory of the entire place 30 years ago. I helped him actually measure about 1% of the trees and make a map of the forest types. It took us two or three days and has been very useful for managing the timber.
You don't have to mark each tree to do a good job of management..

OneWithWood · « **Reply #13 on:** December 06, 2003, 04:34:13 am »

Ron, I read your info in the knowledge base. Very straight forward and easy to comprehend. Thank-you.
I am going to give the point sampling method a try. I should be able to get what I need with a few additional notes. .

Ron Wenrich · « **Reply #14 on:** December 06, 2003, 04:37:56 am »

If you run into any problems, please feel free to ask questions.

rebocardo · « **Reply #15 on:** December 06, 2003, 02:00:38 pm »

FWIW: As long as it was not around my house, I would let people hunt on my land. Serious hunters will not do anything damaging to your property. I only have 30 acres and people hunt and ATV across it all the time. It is the non-locals up from NY NY you have to worry about, imo. Unless you are worried about slugs in the trees.

OneWithWood · « **Reply #16 on:** December 08, 2003, 06:56:30 am »

Rebo,
It is the local hunters who insist on using screw in steps that create the most grief for me. If someone is courteous enough to ask my permision and agree to my standards I will let them hunt the property. I only ask that they refrain from injuring the trees in any way and that they let me know when and where they will be hunting.

Ron Wenrich · « **Reply #17 on:** December 08, 2003, 02:01:11 pm »

I've seen where some good hunters went and used RR spikes for steps. I even hit them with a saw.

Bro. Noble · « **Reply #18 on:** December 08, 2003, 03:16:07 pm »

DanG Ron,

Ya hit um with a saw

Whadda ya do to the bad hunters?

We had a new neighbor who is a surveyor (registered in several states). He did a bunch of surveying and needed to cross our land. He nailed little flags to a bunch of trees with #16 nails. I suggested that he retrace his steps and remove them

Norm · « **Reply #19 on:** December 09, 2003, 04:41:23 am »

That Ron is tough on folks isn't he.

We have an old woodlot that adjoins our place, probably 6-10 acres. I tried to buy it but the guy who owns it with his sister live out of state. I never could get ahold of em so I just sent them a polite letter asking if they'd be interested in selling. One day this guy shows up at our place and says he's the owner and this land has been in his family for 3 generations. Not interested in selling because people would just clear it off for farmland. I asked permission to hunt there and he said that would be fine if I would keep and eye on it for him. Last weekend I was hunting there and about every 100' on the outside border he had put up a sign nailed into some beautiful red oaks and red elms that read "Hollingsworth Forest"

News:

Author Topic: Tree Tags (Read 2502 times)