Get your Forestry Forum Hats while they last!
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
I'd call that a hickory. Possibly mockernut.Can you cut with a sharp knife or use a block plane to get a nice smooth patch of end grain in the heartwood, and take a close up of it?
Confirmation. Most definitely hickory.
The ring porous nature is obvious with the very large pores that initiate the annual growth ring followed by much smaller pores.
I use Hoadley's books. I was able to ID some black ash in the barn frame I'm restoring, with confirmation from Hoadley himself.
Looks ash-like, fine rays and solitary late wood pores, tyloses in early wood pores. Kind of dark though, should be more grayish brown for white ash. Not very rot resistant. Was thinking sassafras, but the pore pattern is not right in the latewood. Ash is quite tough stuff in my experience.
I think you may have it SD. I compared my photo to the Hoadley photos for white and black ash. Looks like white to me. Early on I had compared the tangential section to white ash, but wasn't sure. Now, I am more confident. I tried to look at a piece of white ash here, but couldn't see it as well as the photo. I may try to get another photo of some known white ash at work where I have my "laboratory" equipment, i.e. a sharp chisel and a tripod for my camera.
It's ash alright, nothing else fits. But, black ash is light like American elm when dry. White ash is heavy and hard and lustrous, black is dull when worked, no luster. There are parenchyma joining some pores in the white ash and they don't usually do that in black. If you look close to my picture, some looked linked in a chain of pores in the late wood by the parenchyma. Dave's are more solitary, so I would say he has black ash there along with the brown heartwood. White ash would have light yellow streaks in the heartwood, not as dark as black ash.
It's black ash. Confirmed by R. Bruce Hoadley.
You, too were on the black locust path until the pics.
I don't think its sweetgum.
Testing New Bottom Sponsor Area