BID ON A FORUM AUCTION!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Jobs idea might be right, but the jobs are being created Off-Shore.
I hate the windmills near us. They are such a blight on what used to be rolling hills of farmland. We have about 200 of them 10 miles west of us, with another 200 or so in the works. You see them on the horizon. At night, instead of seeing a beautiful sky of stars, you see 200+ blinking red lights obliterating any view of nighttime skies. They are ugly.One small nuke (or coal for that matter) plant would be far more welcome than 400 windmills stretching on for miles in my opinion.
One small nuke (or coal for that matter) plant would be far more welcome than 400 windmills stretching on for miles in my opinion.
Of course, when you are downwind of all those coal plants, and the acid rain is leaching the calcium from your soils, destroying the productivity of our forests and lakes, you may tend to have a different view.
nothing wrong with wind as a suppliment to the already existing electric grid. i just get a little preturbed when the good folk seem to think they can use wind power or solar power the same as they do for there house. they expect lights to come on when the switch is flipped.
The local farmers/landowners all like the extra money even if the view isn't so good. They sure did spend a bunch of money to cut in the roads thru the woods along these mtn tops so they could build them .
Some thing that people forget or maybe never knew, Nuclear is a non renewable resource.Stonebroke
Maybe ya should read what this farmer went through... Wisconsin Farmer Has Regrets ;http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/wisconsin-farmer-has-regrets
He was interviewed by Don Bangart who wrote the following on behalf of the farmer, whose contract with the wind company prevents him from speaking openly about any problems.
I've never heard anyone complaining of these windmills on Mars Hill.
Discussions on wind turbines are like discussions of logging. You can find videos on the web on how terrible logging is. How it is a travesty against nature and the environment. How it is an eyesore. How it affects the wildlife and quality of human life in areas effected. Those who populate this web site know better than anyone how bogus such claims are. So it is with these anti-wind videos. I'm not saying there aren't any issues with wind farms, but the anti-wind examples being posted here seem to be bordering on propaganda. There are groups that will enter a small town that is being prospected for their wind resource with pre-packaged anti-wind media kits. They stir up resentment even though they don't live anywhere near the area in question. You can hear the same "testimonials" verbatim from town to town.Earlier in this thread there was a complaint that the farms are being set up on timber company owned property and locals aren't getting a piece of the pie. Yet we are presented with a farmers complaint that there is inequity of payments to individual lessors. By keeping the sites on those parcels owned by large companies, the wind companies can circumvent such accusations and also avoid having to negotiate with several dozen individuals. Also, these large parcels are usually more remote and thus impact fewer humans. Danged if they do, Danged if they don't. The 'anonymous' farmer complaining about how he is being trampled over? He has a contract. If the wind company is exceeding the terms of the contract, why doesn't he take them to court? Sounds like a fish tale to me. The aesthetic part is all relative. i thought the sight of turbines spinning gracefully was inspiring long before my current employment. I can understand how others may not agree though. I do find it amusing though that one group fighting a potential site claims it will destroy their town, their quality of life and will discourage tourism while what few outsiders who do venture into town are gagging on the smell from the nearby pulp mill. ( No offense to you pulp-ers, but Dang that smell is nasty!)I empathize, Mr. T, but base your opinion on facts you observe, not on what you are being fed. Visit a site. Listen for yourself. See how many citizens are really within range of a turbine to be affected by strobing. Make your own observations of wildlife. (One of my team mates has photos of a bear exploring the base of a turbine.) Whether detractors care to admit it or not, there is a tremendous amount of money being pumped into many Maine towns that have nothing else going for them these days and many of the local business are extremely grateful for it. (Image hidden from quote, click to view.)Stetson Wind Project, Danforth, ME
Theres also a transmission line being built up the middle of the US. When this is finished, wind power will be able to provide 100% of the nations power.
Mars Hill Wind FarmYeah, the 240 foot blade thing was the first I ever heard of it. They are 138 feet or there abouts according to the Mars Hill Wind Farm.
When this is finished, wind power will be able to provide 100% of the nations power.
Quote from: TexasSawmiller on March 25, 2010, 11:07:23 am When this is finished, wind power will be able to provide 100% of the nations power.Doubt It Texas talk Welcome TexasSawmiller
Wind parks here operate at about an 80% average due to the location. This occurs all through the center of the US due to the prevailing winds.
Other sites don't do as well. Take the Stetson mountain project. GE was told that that particular park would only operate at 20% capacity, yet they still erected it. Why is this? The answer is two fold. One, to create jobs. Two, if the park DOESN'T Produce at optimum capacity, the owners can take a loss on their taxes.
TexasSawMiller has made some pretty strong claims for wind. The easiest way to refute baloney is with truth. Here's the latest chart from Bonneville Power showing how much wind power they are producing. http://www.transmission.bpa.gov/business/operations/Wind/baltwg.aspxThe top line is total load and the bottom line is wind generated power. You can quickly see that on March 20th and the 23rd the windmills produced practically nothing and never produced capacity. Less anyone claim this is unusual click the link at the top of the page to go back through previous weeks, it's always the same and this is for windmills in prime locations. Bonneville Power has spent $3 billion dollars on windmills, most of which taxpayers paid for through subsidies that pay about 70% of the cost in 5 years. Bonneville Power makes money on their windmills not through power generation but through those subsidies which we pay for. If this is not enough to convince anyone I'll be glad to post charts from Ireland or Germany showing the same results or worse.
Welcome Texas Sawmiller I think the dimensions I mentioned were based on overall specs not individual pieces From 2 miles away I dont think anyone would notice 100 ft more or less Just a thought
It will take up 10 miles of mt top there 400 ft high with 240 ft blades