Get your Forestry Forum Hats while they last!
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
If you're a homeowner looking for a saw to use on one or two weekends a month, then you will probably be best suited with something middle of the road. If you're a pro making a living with your saw then you don't need to ask the question. Since I'm not familiar with most of the homeowner models from which you will likely end up picking, I'll back out until you can narrow it down a little bit. And for the record, most everyone in the past who has shown up asking "What is the single best saw out there?" has ended up buying something cheap marketed toward bargain hunting homeowners. So forgive me if my reply seems a bit harsh.
I agree Pro saw or nothing at all. I personally run Stihl, I like the service at my local Dealer and thats what they sell. I have a 180 that is awsome when I am bush hogging and working fence lines. I love my 026 (260) and I still use it a lot but I kept going through mounts by pushing it through too big of wood too fast. I bought a 036 and I absoloutly love it and it has never been to the shop for repairs. I also have a 361 that I bought for my help and I like that just as well. I bought an 045 and that is the cats meow for cutting firewood off of a pile of tree length and for bucking large trees. I bought the 045 because I practically stole it from an old feller and I wanted to try out a larger saw, it is going to be replaced with a 460 within the next few months. Long story longer I would not want a 460 without at least one of the smaller saws and I wouldn't want the 260 without at least one of the larger saws. I guess that narrows it down to the 361. My wife often asks how many chainsaws I really need, to which I reply 1 more ( I use the same line for guns).
I dropped into the 260 from 044 and 028 for ease of use: the weight of the saws was making me whine. Age, old stupid injuries coming home to roost. So far so good except when I could use a longer bar and not get bogged down in bigger DBH cuts. Most of my wood is in the 18"- 24" range here. Is the 361 really that good for the extra weight and power ( and $$) over the 260 ? Like they say it will cure ingrown toenails, dandruff, etc... ?
Yah, age and injury... I have tendonitis and arthritis, but no white finger (yet). The 361 is (or was, no longer sold here) that much better considering the prices. The 260 PRO (260 non-PRO is no longer sold in the states either) is $530. The 361 here was $610. $80 difference, and a hell of a lot more saw for the money. No comparison, in my view. The 026 falls short on power in larger stuff. I regularly run a 25 inch bar on my 361s. I bought one with a 28 inch on it that I swapped over to my 044, where it is at home. I have three 361s and five (or maybe 6 with loose parts) 260/026s. All my 026s are non-PRO models. No real need for the decomp or the adjustable oilers. The 'non-Pro' 260 runs just as good as the 260-PRO. The 260 has more plastic; the starter housing on the 260 is plastic (as was the 'case' on some of the 036/360s). That said, I recommend a 260s to people that do not need the grunt of a 361. They are good saws, but the design is old and the 346xp is better in class (more plastic there too). As for running only 'pro' vs 'homeowner' saws, there is a lot of overlap between the two classes of saws. For example, the 026 has a plastic starter, and the 390 has a decomp and adjustible oiler. The non-PRO 026 is really a pro saw. Where you draw the line is what works in your particular situation. I have done a lot of falling, thinning and limbing with so-called homeowner saws, like Echo 3000s and Stihl 290/390s. The 390 has about the same power of a 361 and can run a 25 inch bar no porblem. They are built (in my view) almost as well, and they will last for many years with care. They do not last as long, but they run, and they fall trees. The 250 on the other hand (I have had a lot of 1123 Stihl saws) is just not up there anywhere near the power or quality compared to the 260. The 290 and 250 saws are also clamshell engine cases, and if you plan on porting or rebuilding them, well, then get one of the 'pro' saws. If I could go back and do it all over again, I would have bought a new 361 and a 260 non-PRO saw pair to start with, and picked up a good used 440 along the way. I have owned many of the newer Stihl saws at one time or other: 020, 210, 230, 250, 026, 290, 361, 044, 460, & 660. I have found that I can bog down even a 660 in a cut if I lever and lean in too hard on it. So you have to have a feather touch on all saws at some point. As for the term, 'no replacement for displacement,' I have found that it is better to run and use the smallest and lightest saw that I can get away with using. Reason being that weight, torque/power and vibration all will fatigue me far faster than light, feathering, and smooth cutting will. After several hours, it is very much noticable, and after the end of the day soaking in the hot tub, I feel a lot better running the 361 over any other saw I have owned. But then I am older and greyer. When I was 20 I ran a pair of MAC 380s. Talk about heavy ball-busting tempramental beasts. Thumbing the manual oiler while running them surely messed up my thumbs. Never mind the hard starting and weight...
The 260 Pro is a waste of $$.Agreed. But Stihl does not sell the non-pro model here in the states any more. Only the 260-PRO model. Supposedly Stihl is moving the 260 in with the 290 in the to-be-released strato engine models later in 2010. The 260 was obsoletized by the 270, but sales of the 260 remain far better than the 270. Compared to the 361, the 270 was a wasted design. Nearly the same weight and not nearly the power. The 362 is about 3/4 of a pound more than the 361. So they beefed up the power to compensate. And the price! *cough* Near $700 here. A hot tub is a good idea... time for a dip. My shoulder is killing me. I have a Hot Spring Jetsetter tub. Portable, I dragged it up here form California with me. Dip well We're getting snow dumped on us here now and through Sunday--easy 12" + on the flat and growing fast and drifting. Just finished tamping down the 2-3 mi of skid trails. The Snorkel will be cold for awhile ( neat tub BTW ).
Dip well We're getting snow dumped on us here now and through Sunday--easy 12" + on the flat and growing fast and drifting. Just finished tamping down the 2-3 mi of skid trails. The Snorkel will be cold for awhile ( neat tub BTW ).
> "rebocardo .. where were you makin that kinda moeny i want in on that "The $ was on the hours part, not the 160 I got 160+ hours from the saw. Though $150 an hour is what I would charge for a crew of 4.
Gee, what's all this about "homeowners" not needing 'pro'gear ?Sorry that both Gary (Gasoline) and Brian (Rocky J. ) are now "homeless" Having been on both "sides" of the fence, pro grade tools are worth the $$$$. Then again, it's the skill, attitude, and training that makes it. I've seen and hired "pros" not worth &%$#@ , and non-pros so highly skilled that they would put any 'pro' into the ground using a chainsaw ( or firearms, or ______ ). Watch one of the Game of Logging contests, or the other Logging games.
Quote from: downeast on January 02, 2010, 02:54:51 pmGee, what's all this about "homeowners" not needing 'pro'gear ?Sorry that both Gary (Gasoline) and Brian (Rocky J. ) are now "homeless" Having been on both "sides" of the fence, pro grade tools are worth the $$$$. Then again, it's the skill, attitude, and training that makes it. I've seen and hired "pros" not worth &%$#@ , and non-pros so highly skilled that they would put any 'pro' into the ground using a chainsaw ( or firearms, or ______ ). Watch one of the Game of Logging contests, or the other Logging games.LMAO... What does GOL have to do with anything?Gary
I think Gary knows what GOL is, we've spent enough days discussing the merits as well as shortcomings of their program at great lengths. I believe Gary may even know a couple GOL instructors personally. I think his point was that GOL wasn't the topic of discussion in this thread. The OP was simply looking for the perfect chainsaw. Thanks for the offer of a place to camp. What brand of mattress are you providing and are the sheets at least 800 thread count? Scratchy sheets give me a terrible rash. Speaking of breakfast, what are you serving tomorrow?
Got a tent boys ? We got space in the snow here for you homeless. The Game of Logging isn't a game except for the name. It's a *DanG serious approach to using a saw efficiently, safely, with speed, and with accuracy such as dropping a leaner where YOU want it. Look it up....very interesting way of looking at tool use as a "sport". For example: I never bored before the GOL program. Think firearms courses and "contests" used in sniper training, or rock climbing. Techniques learned in GOL have made this so-called "Homeowner" (sic ) cut faster, safer, more accurately. Hey, Gary (and Brian) when you stop learning anything, it's time to not come down for breakfast. Got a tip on which oil to use ?
This homeowner vs pro thing is useless, useless.....unless, unless there's an image problem. For you pro non-homeowner homeless there are no free lunches Downeast: no nothing but space on the ground. May make men out of you, rashes and all. Oh yeah, breakfast for the hubris-afflicted is Humble Pie---bring your own utencils.
Apples to apples... However... I still for the life of me, cannot see why people will bore cut every single tree they cut. It is a false sense that you are safer and in control... it's actually more dangerous than your typical conventional, or humboltGary
Just acquired a Stihl 044 and a 028 and am trying to decide which one to keep. I imagine the suggestion will be to keep them both but I don't think I really need two saws for my anticipated use and would like to get some of the money back that I paid for them. For now I plan on mainly using it to cut appx. 2 cords a year of oak and pine firewood in addition to minor use around the yard for pruning walnut and cedar trees. The 044 came with a 3/8" 25" bar and the 028 has a .325" 20" bar. I am leaning towards the 28 being the best for my all-around use but could get talked in to the 44. Any opinions on if the 44 is overkill or if it's better to have the power and bar length for when I might need it. Could I keep the 44 and get a 20" bar for most of my use and then have the 28" on hand? Decisions...
Just acquired a Stihl 044 and a 028 and am trying to decide which one to keep. I imagine the suggestion will be to keep them both but I don't think I really need two saws for my anticipated use and would like to get some of the money back that I paid for them. For now I plan on mainly using it to cut appx. 2 cords a year of oak and pine firewood in addition to minor use around the yard for pruning walnut and cedar trees.
That 028 wouldn't make a pimple on the behind of an 044 .Keep the 44 . I don't think there's a pound difference in weight but there sure is in power .
gasoline71 i like your saying chicks dig scars i was in the wrong place at the wrong time tree wacked me right in my face from my lip down my chin down my neck. Split right open lots of stitches and surgery and cracked my chin bone and knocked 4 bottom teeth out and cracked my jaw bone had to replace all of that but im still cutting even more wood than before
Maybe you should come to New England and spend a day with a me to get a first hand look at how we do things and why we do them. And then I will go to your neck of the woods and do the same. I think we both could learn something here and come away with a better understanding of each others jobs.
I don't know if the last 028's were made before or after the 044 came out. I don't think there was an overlap but I could be wrong. I think they might have had electronic ignition on the last few years of the 028. If yours says 'electronic' then it's most likely one with electronic ignition. The 028 was introduced in 1977 and the 044 was introduced in 1993.
Testing New Bottom Sponsor Area