Get your Forestry Forum Hats while they last!
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Scott,No need for a drawing, I understand your great explanation. -When you mill the top 16 ". Do you get a 16" board or 2/8" baoards with your Peterson mill.
Quote from: Lil Badger Creek on November 29, 2009, 10:37:34 pmScott,The Baker moulder is in place, and I've started ordering cutters for it, but still need to do the final wiring and dust collection. I picked up the fuel line for the generator today. Unfortunately I need to sit down and pull together some of the invoices for replacement tools and equipment that I've bought this year, and submit them to the insurance co for reimbursement. I've got a lot of $ out of pocket and need to get it back! That will probably occupy the latter half of this week. Next week back on the generator though!
Scott,
Thanks for the details. I bet that insurance stuff seems like it will never end...documentation and more paper work. My prayers are with you. It is going to be exciting to have every thing up and going. What kind of dust collector are you using? Is it a cyclone style?
1-3/16. Quartersawn material will shrink more in thickness and less in width relative to plain sawn.
Quote from: Gblombo on November 11, 2009, 10:37:24 pm1-3/16. Quartersawn material will shrink more in thickness and less in width relative to plain sawn.That is exactly the opposite what I would have thought...since the grain is vertical, it seems it should shrink in the width, not the thickness. I take your word for it, I don't have much experience in milling timber, just that it seems that the shrinking happens as the grain compresses together, I thought timber typically doesn't shrink on the end grain (length).Cheers,Alan
Typically plane sawn lumber will shrink about 7-9% in width and 3-4% in thickness from the time it is dead green to KD 7%MC. When you quarter saw lumber the numbers flip flop.
I thought timber typically doesn't shrink on the end grain (length).
When you say the numbers flip flop, that must be a generalized comment, as that would surely depend on the direction of the grain.
I'm confused on how the numbers could flip flop in regard to cutting quarter sawn though, if it is truly QS. I would think the shrinkage would be much less for QS as the grain is vertical, so the thickness should change very little.
You have to understand radial growth (pith to bark, ring thickness) and tangential within a ring in circumference of the tree. The tree is putting on cell growth in 3 directions. The longitudinal is vertical growth, the part with little shrinkage when drying. When your flat sawing your peeling off layers of growth, on the wide side. Not quite like slicing veneer since your cutting through rings because a tree doesn't grow square. If you look on the edge of the board you see a quartered appearance where you have split down through the rings. In quarter sawed you are splitting down through the rings on the wide side of the board and looking from edge to edge shows layers of growth rings. Just the opposite to flat sawed. Tangential shrinkage is more pronounced than in the radial direction. This is why it flip flops. The physical properties of wood don't change no matter how you saw it. It's an illusion if you don't understand what is going on. Shrinkage within a ring varies in relation to early wood and late wood as well. Early wood is less dense.
Allen, try to find the book by Bruce Hoadly called Understanding Wood. A good book to help you understand why wood does the things it does and how it is made up.
I don't totally understand how to correctly quarter saw a log, I guess, been trying to find that info, but see a couple different methods.
Testing New Bottom Sponsor Area