BID ON A FORUM AUCTION!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tom, there is plenty of dry land forest in this region, that can be managed and harvested that doen't require this new wetland permit. Whether this new (million dollar) wetland regulation does become law, there would not be anyimpact to the logging industry in this region, "providing they continue to harvest timber from dry land areas only" and stay away from harvesting wetlands, and buffer zones near streams and lakes areas.
That's it, keep pressing him. I suspect the damage is emotional duress, but that is not really a legal reason for damages. So there must be more to it than just the absolute horror of seeing dirty water go past your property. Because that probably happens every time it rains and not just when some logger is nearby to blame.
I noodled around this morning to get an update on the proposed changes to the stream crossing laws, but can't seem to find anything newOn the NH timber land owners siteI found this statement , but even on the NHDES site I cannot find anything else.Stream Crossing Rules NHDES Postpones hearings – seeks more public inputAt NHTOA’s urging the NH Department of Environmental Services is postponing the hearings on their proposed Stream Crossing Rules. Although the rules, as approved by a diverse stakeholder group last year, were not intended to negatively impact forest management the latest version would. “As proposed, this rule change will have a devastating impact on New Hampshire’s timber harvesting community” said Jasen Stock, Executive Director of the New Hampshire Timberland Owners Association. Besides complicating the administrative/permitting process, in their current form the proposed rules would make the use of any round or closed bottom culvert on a stream wider than 5-feet that drains more than 20 acres uneconomical for any forestry operation. NHDES hopes to have a revised version of the rules proposal available later this week from which they will be taking public comment until November 20th. All comments should be mailed to;
nero, now your calling loggers morons, i think thats like the pot calling the kettle black. last night it accured to me that i am a "tree hugger".. when i'm in the woods before i cut down a tree i always reach both arms around the tree to see if it's big enough to cut, so i guess that makes me a "tree hugger". do us all a favor mrnero find a different forum to push your narrow minded ideas for env. control, this forum is for people trying to make a living with forest products...
do us all a favor mrnero find a different forum to push your narrow minded ideas for env. control, this forum is for people trying to make a living with forest products...
Mrnero, what kind of vehicle do you drive?
Mr nero, I wrote a while back that you should stick around for a while and see what you could learn, you have stuck around. Well its 30 plus days !!!! Could you please list what you have learned positive and negative *( without attitude )* !!!! I am actually interested and will respond to your response !!
sorry for wanting you to leave mrnero, maybe this issue hits to close to home, it just seems that over the years little by little it starts out small but, like cancer it keeps growing and growing, our way of life is being challenged and changed to suit the ever growing group or organization. about 3 yrs ago property 1/4 mile from my sawmill was sold and subdivided making 22 lots 3 acres in size, mind you we live in the country same location for 35 yrs. anyway a couple of potential buyers of lots started a small movement wanting my mill shut down for peace and solitude, none of my neibors have a problem with my operation, luckly the town board was not having any of their doings. so, weather it is a wetland permit, banning o.w.b. protecting the grey wolf ect. there must be an equal balance. ya mrnero, you really do p*** me off but, i do understand your feelings on this matter, your runoff is to you what them wanting to have my mill closed is to me. so i think we can agree to disagree
Congrats on the impending payoff of the truck, mrnero. Now I'm going to assume that the speedometer on that truck goes up to 120mph, implying that the truck will go that fast. How would you feel about it if you had to pay for a 120mph speeding ticket every time you enter a roadway? If that was the case, you probably wouldn't drive very much, would you? That absurd scenario is exactly the same thing you are proposing with this oppressive stream crossing rule...fining someone in advance for something they may or may not do in the future. Answer; Let me see, If I was to get a 120 mile per hr speeding ticket every time I entered the roadways or what we call as "public right of way" I would then probably start to consider using the bike trails to drive on. The stream crossing issue doesn't only come up when you are logging wetlands. There are plenty of situations where you have to cross a stream when dry-land logging too. It is plain to me that this rule was written with the intention of stifling logging in general, by a bunch of whiners who haven't a clue of what good Forestry practices are all about.