Get your Forestry Forum Hats while they last!
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Well Joe either people work extremely cheaply in India or you tell a good story
Al, now you decide for yourself whether I tell good stories or we work cheap out here.Joe
..How does the income compare to the general cost of living there?
So are things getting better over there? Stonebroke
What is your trade / business ? MechanicVT
100 pistons is needing 100 saws , so that is not a good investment in my eyes.VT
The problem with India was not lack of knowledge but corruption
[ Not out here where they ruin their saws cutting rubber trees.Each machine averages at least a piston a month.Some of my best customers walk in twice a week for a piston change!!That's no story Al. honest.So, 100 pistons would not last me more than a couple of months.My customers have started to ruin their cylinders too, that's why I need to make it cheaper for them with a sleeve job for their cylinders. Joe
Well Joe ,of course this is the internet and I like a good story as well as the next guy ,but a saw eating up two pistons a month is stretching it just a tad bit . Are they running sand mixed in the fuel or something ? What about the cylinders and the rest of the workings of these abused saws ,it takes more than a piston to make a saw go putt putt putt ya know .Go get em ,I won't say a thing you already have an enraptured audience
Al_Smith lives inside a bubble.
Mr Joe , just tell us more , And if your going with 100 pistons , etc, why not buy a cyl boring machine.
Me too.
Joe, is your question about oversize pertaining to the bore or a tighter fit on the piston? I didn't understand it. It seems to me that if there was some way to improve the fuel and oil mix the original nikasil cylinders would last much longer. Why do you think the saws go bad so quickly? Joe from the U.S.A.
........................However on the true meaning of rebuilding saws and having done 3 or 4 myself of course I would question poor old Joe on this stuff having traveled that road a time or two . I can't help myself .
..is it an availability issue with the mixing oil or cost that makes for the guys to use used oil cut with deisel as mix . Or is it all that is made available ...
Im thinking cost isawlogs.I have used a line-bore tool to over size barrels . Ill post a pix of it..VTLISLE 15000 CYLINDER HONE(Image hidden from quote, click to view.)
That said ,those little Lisle hones can do a good enough job on an iron cylinder for a chainsaw,motorcycle whatever .Now where or why people ever get the idea you can resize a plated cylinder is beyond my comprehension . Further more even if you could replate a cylinder and replace a piston with some off the wall size it would cost more than the saw is worth .Chainsaws are not like Chevy 350's that every after market supplier makes over sized pistons for .Sure ,maybe Joe can get pistons made for next to nothing .You can even make rings if you have the where with all .The bottom line is that other than for reasons of experimentation it's not economically feasible .
I imagine without researching that most likely McCulloch was about the last to use replaceable iron cylinders . I'm guessing late 70's to early 80's the practice was discontinued in favor of plated cylinders .
Back in the 60's, 70's, 80's cylinder bores were the same material as the engine block and I don't know anyone who used sleeves unless they had Aluminum blocks.Jim
Since the cylinder is closed at one end a honing tool like the one suggested by VT cannot be used.So machining is limited to a lathe.The fine grooves created wear out the piston in no time.
I have purchased a new camera, so I was able to snap some pictures of the process involved in installing a CI sleeve on a chainsaw (MS460) cylinder.I have uploaded the first lot of ten pics into my gallery.http://www.forestryforum.com/gallery/index.php?cat=15459I shall upload more in installments so as not to sacrifice the quality of the pics.Could somebody suggest how I should upload a video.Joe
The thermal expansion coefficient for aluminum is about 3 times larger than for cast iron. If cold clearance is correct for an Al sleeve, it will be very tight with a cast iron sleeve at operating temperature..Increasing the bore from 52 to 52.5 mm will increase the displacement by about 2 percent, and if nothing else is changed, the power should also increase by 2 percent. Goining to a 53 mm bore will give a 4 percent increase in displacement.
Increasing the bore PROBABLY increases the torque, but displacement is dependent on both bore and stroke. I do not see any firm connection between displacement and torque.
I think that the bigger bore has also been the cause for the usable power to be available at a lower rpm.In auto techie lingo, would I be correct in stating that the engine develops a broader power band with the maximum rpm trimmed off a bit?
Yes Joe!! They call them "Supers" !!
Quote from: Rockfarmer on April 24, 2009, 06:27:13 amYes Joe!! They call them "Supers" !!RockfarmerIf those are called Supers, what are Magnums?
.In auto techie lingo, would I be correct in stating that the engine develops a broader power band with the maximum rpm trimmed off a bit?
Quote from: joe_indi on April 24, 2009, 06:04:42 am .In auto techie lingo, would I be correct in stating that the engine develops a broader power band with the maximum rpm trimmed off a bit? In a manner of speaking . Depends on a lot factors not just bore size .For example a Ford 300 cubic inch I6 develops max power at most likely 2800-3400 rpm . An old John Deere 70 gaser only runs at around 1100 rpm max but puts out max power at around 800 .In my opinion it's rather pointless dealing with saw engines to worry weather it cranks out another 600 rpm's or so because they are going to run wherever they run at with regards to speed .
I've added some images of the oversize piston, the new chrome rings and the sleeved cylinder. ?joe
Testing New Bottom Sponsor Area